fix(bug-1731): fire HOOK_DETAIL_JOB_FAIL on WAL_JOB_FAIL apply
Follow-up to ebe691c3 (HOOK_DETAIL_JOB_START/JOB_EXIT), same gap for job
failures: apply_committed_entry()'s WAL_JOB_FAIL case only ever fired
the generic HOOK_DETAIL_JOB_UPDATE, leaving sched_job_fail_fun (sched.c)
and apiserver_job_fail_fun (apiserver.c) dead -- the apiserver's
OnJobFinished was starved of data for job failures specifically (the
prior fix only closed this for clean finishes).
Fires HOOK_DETAIL_JOB_FAIL only for the WAL_JOB_FAIL_STAGE_FLAG branch,
which already constructs a real job_failinfo_t -- the legacy _pad==0
absolute-overwrite branch has no fail-specific data and must not
fabricate one, mirroring how the WAL_JOB_START fix only fires when
pidinfo was genuinely decoded. Unlike WAL_JOB_START, no gate-widening
was needed: apply_job_fail_transition() always returns
JOB_TRANSITION_APPLIED for a genuine new fail transition (confirmed by
reading it), so the existing result-gated early return already covers
this correctly.
TDD: RED confirmed (fix reverted, test failed "Expected 2 Was 1"),
GREEN after restoring it. Full regression: 1220 tests, only the known
bug-1561 flake.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019QxaSzHRB7pmYFp4cVnwkA
This commit is contained in:
parent
6193fa7ea1
commit
670098150d
3 changed files with 173 additions and 4 deletions
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue