A user-reported core dump showed xce_scheduler crashing with SIGSEGV in
its allocator thread: zarray_get_ex dereferencing a NULL array->data
inside match_job_host_limit_() (plugins/limit.c), reached via schedobj.c's
reset_sched_obj().
Root cause: zarray_fini() freed array->data and set it to NULL, but left
array->caps/count/pos at their stale pre-fini values instead of resetting
to the safe (0,0,0) state zarray_init() establishes. xlist_fini() had the
identical gap. Both structs' own bounds checks (`idx >= caps`) treat a
nonzero caps as a guarantee that data is a valid allocation -- a
guarantee broken for any caller that reuses the same struct after
_fini() without re-init.
schedobj.c's reset_sched_obj() does exactly that: it tears down a job's
own PERSISTENT schedobj (reused for the job's whole lifetime, not a
disposable scratch object) whenever the cluster's config version has
advanced, with no matching re-init. Once a host-limit match had grown
hlimits' capacity, and the config version bumped again while that job
sat PEND, the next allocation attempt for the same job dereferenced the
torn array -- exactly matching the reported backtrace. This same crash
class had already caused at least one earlier, never-successfully-root-
caused crash near the same call site (2026-08-17).
Fixed at the library-primitive level rather than reset_sched_obj()'s
call site: zarray_fini()/xlist_fini() now reset caps/count/pos to 0,
matching what _init() establishes. This makes every existing
_fini()-then-reuse caller correct by construction, with zero changes
needed at any call site. Audited every non-test zarray_fini()/
xlist_fini() call site first -- none relies on caps/count surviving
_fini(), so this is a pure safety improvement, not a behavior change.
RED confirmed by temporarily disabling both resets: new tests failed
cleanly ("Expected 0 Was 4" / "Expected 0 Was 2", the stale pre-fini
caps). GREEN confirmed restored: full lib suite 314/314, scheduler
suite 77/77, zero regressions.
bug-1817.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLSNJhNoULvVcUhXEFafQC
