3.1 KiB
| id | status | status_updated | status_note | component | severity | timestamp | last_seen | occurrences | files | tags | related | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bug-1914 | open | 2026-10-03 | newly logged | controller | wrong-result | 2026-10-03T15:07:26Z | 2026-10-03T15:07:26Z | 1 |
|
|
|
bug-1914: config push fails -110 under heavy CPU load: commit lands just after the 500 ms barrier
Description
Observed:
Error: controller returned status -110
xceadmin config push to a healthy, normally elected HA primary (standbys promoted from the vote connections, own-term no-op already committed) was rejected with -ETIMEDOUT: the config marker's majority commit landed ~75 ms after the repl_wait_majority_ack(..., CONF_PUSH_TIMEOUT_MS) barrier (config_repl.c ~1658; CONF_PUSH_TIMEOUT_MS = 500, config_repl.h:33) expired. Seen only with the CPU heavily oversubscribed (40 busy loops on 32 cores).
Expected: a push to a healthy primary with a reachable majority succeeds under load, or the barrier is sized/structured so normal scheduling delay cannot turn a soon-to-commit marker into a rejection. (A commit that lands after the client was told -110 also leaves the outcome ambiguous to the client: rejected per the reply, yet committed later.)
Impact: spurious push failures under heavy load (fail-loud, no data loss). If the marker then commits after the -110 reply, the client believes the push failed while the cluster activated it -- a retry is idempotent per tag, but the reply is misleading. Check before changing: whether the late commit is actually applied after the -110 reply, and the async-I/O rules for the commit-wait barrier (COMMIT_WAIT_RESERVED, .kiro/steering/ha-async-io.md).
Found by: test (bug-1485 investigation, 2026-10-03)
Environment
- OS: no /etc/os-release; Docker container; NixOS kernel; kernel Linux 6.18.33 x86_64
- libc: glibc 2.42-47 (interpreter /nix/store/wb6rhpznjfczwlwx23zmdrrw74bayxw4-glibc-2.42-47/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
- Toolchain: gcc (GCC) 15.2.0, meson 1.9.1
- Build: asan (xce.build)
- Code: scheduler-framework @ 4cd5fb7d-dirty
- Deployment: local 3-node HA (xceadmin
live_ha_clusterfixture), CPU oversubscribed with 40 busy loops on 32 cores
Reproduction
- Start 40 CPU busy loops on a 32-core host.
- Loop
src/xceadmin/tests/test_e2e_live_ha_push.py(with the bug-1485 readiness wait in place). - Rarely, the push fails with
controller returned status -110on a primary whose own-term no-op had already committed; the primary log shows the marker commit ~75 ms after the 500 ms barrier expired.
- Frequency: 1/70 HA push loops under heavy load, 0 idle (2026-10-03)
- Evidence: not kept (scratchpad loop logs from the bug-1485 investigation)
Root cause
TODO: required for fixed/partial
Fix
TODO: required for fixed/partial
Verification
- Test: TODO: name + file; RED before the fix, GREEN after
- Suites: TODO: suite results and build profile
- Live: TODO: soak/deploy run, or n/a and why
References
- Related: none