myxce/.kiro/specs/clusterconfig-schema-split/research.md
Rongsong Shen 1229f9a945 feat(controller): clusterconfig-schema-split task 2.1 — cluster_open_listener two-tier port fallback
Replaces the cluster_config->port fallback (dead after task 1.2) with:
--peers candidate match (unchanged, including single self-referencing
entries for a custom single-node port) -> hardcoded XCE_CONTROLLER_DEFAULT_PORT
(9990) when --peers was never passed at all. The --peers-given-but-local-
name-absent case still returns -EINVAL and refuses to start, unchanged.

Also folds in task 1.3's discovery (HashZArrayConfig/ResmgrConfig capnp
structs left orphaned by tasks 1.1/1.2, breaking codegen) into
requirements.md (new Req 2.5)/design.md/research.md/tasks.md, and fixes
a design.md citation error (validate_peer_count -> xce_parse_peers) found
during task 2.1's review.
2026-07-21 03:36:01 +00:00

18 KiB

Research & Design Decisions

Summary

  • Feature: clusterconfig-schema-split
  • Discovery Scope: Extension (existing system) — light discovery per design-discovery-light.md
  • Key Findings:
    • candidates, vcpus, and the five perf-tuning fields are genuinely dead in ClusterConfig at runtime (verified across every .c file that touches cluster_config_t).
    • port is NOT dead — its removal (Requirement 1.1) needs a replacement mechanism (Requirement 1.7), which this design resolves as a new --port CLI flag, matching the existing --vcpus pattern exactly.
    • No tooling in this repo (deploy-ha.sh, test scripts) currently starts a controller with zero peer-related flags in a way that would be affected either way — but the codebase's own main.c:294 message ("No --peers flag; running as single-node primary") confirms the zero---peers invocation is an intentional, first-class supported mode, not incidental. The design preserves it exactly rather than forcing a CLI-contract change.

Research Log

Requirement 1.7's port-sourcing replacement mechanism

  • Context: requirements.md Requirement 1.7 deliberately left the replacement mechanism as an open design question after the requirements-phase review found cluster_open_listener (cluster.c:1216-1258) depends on cluster_config->port as the sole port source for single-node mode (no --peers flag passed at all, main.c:293-294).
  • Sources Consulted: src/controller/main.c (CLI parsing, --vcpus precedent at lines 65-66/114-118/252, single-node branch at 293-295), src/controller/cluster.c:1216-1258 (port resolution), src/include/myconf.h (existing CLI-derived field conventions), src/controller/ha.h (hardcoded-default naming convention, HA_DEFAULT_*), prior memory of this codebase (--peers with a single self-referencing candidate is a confirmed, already-used alternative single-node invocation — but no repo tooling actually relies on the zero-flag form being removed).
  • Findings:
    • No standalone --port CLI flag exists today — confirmed via grep (zero hits for OPT_PORT/"port" in main.c).
    • --vcpus establishes the exact pattern to follow: OPT_VCPUS argp option → struct arguments.vcpus → validated → copied into myconf.vcpus (0 = unset sentinel, documented inline in myconf.h:37) → consumed at the point of use with a hardcoded fallback (cluster.c:1320, myapp.c:129: (myconf->vcpus > 0) ? myconf->vcpus : 8).
    • deploy-ha.sh (the only repo-internal controller launcher found) always passes --peers; no repo script exercises the true zero-flag single-node path. This means changing that path's invocation contract would carry no repo-internal tooling risk — but it's still a documented, INFO-logged, intentionally-supported mode (main.c:294), not dead code, so removing it outright is a real behavior change to a supported feature, not cleanup.
    • xce_parse_peers's side effects (CA cert path population, identity string, main.c:278-292) only run inside the if (arguments.peers_str) branch — the zero-flag path currently skips them. Preserving the zero-flag path (rather than forcing a synthetic self-referencing --peers entry) avoids introducing any change to that unrelated cert/identity setup.
  • Implications: Adding --port as a new CLI flag (rather than mandating --peers for all invocations) requires slightly more new code but changes zero existing invocation behavior and directly reuses a pattern already reviewed and shipped in this exact file. Given this spec's own history of an overconfident "zero blast radius" claim being wrong once already, the lower-risk option is preferred even at the cost of a few more lines.

Architecture Pattern Evaluation

Option Description Strengths Risks / Limitations Notes
A: --port CLI flag (chosen) New OPT_PORT flag, myconf.port field, hardcoded fallback constant when unset and not found in --peers Zero invocation-UX change; exact precedent (--vcpus) to copy; isolated, low-risk diff Slightly more new code than B Selected — see Decision below
B: Mandate --peers everywhere (self-referencing entry for single-node) Remove the zero-flag path; single-node must pass --peers ctrl-1=host:port Single source of truth for port; reuses an already-proven 1-peer self-quorum path; less code Removes a documented, intentionally-supported invocation mode; unverifiable whether anything outside this repo (docs, operator muscle memory) depends on the zero-flag form Rejected — the removed mode is intentional/documented, not incidental, and this spec's mandate is schema cleanup, not an invocation-contract change

Design Decisions

Decision: Add --port CLI flag as the replacement for ClusterConfig.port

  • Context: Requirement 1.7 requires a non-ClusterConfig port-sourcing mechanism before port can be removed from the schema, without breaking single-node controller startup.
  • Alternatives Considered: (A) new --port flag, hardcoded fallback default; (B) mandate --peers for all invocations including single-node.
  • Selected Approach: (A). New OPT_PORT argp option → struct arguments.port (uint32_t, default 0) → copied to a new myconf_t.port field → cluster_open_listener()'s fallback branch reads myconf->port instead of cluster_config->port; if still 0 (flag not passed), falls back to a new hardcoded constant XCE_CONTROLLER_DEFAULT_PORT = 9990 (matching today's exact SET_DEFAULT_IF_UNSET(c->port, 0, 9990) value byte-for-byte, so the default behavior is unchanged for anyone relying on it).
  • Rationale: Exact structural precedent already exists and was already reviewed/shipped for --vcpus; zero changes to any existing invocation (scripted or manual); avoids introducing a new port-precedence edge case between two different flags (--port only matters when --peers doesn't supply a match, so precedence is unambiguous: --peers match > --port > hardcoded default).
  • Trade-offs: A few more lines of new code than mandating --peers everywhere; two flags (--peers, --port) both nominally relate to "port" now, though only one (--peers) is meaningful once any peer is configured.
  • Follow-up: None — this is fully specified for the tasks phase.

Risks & Mitigations

  • Risk: A future contributor reintroduces a ClusterConfig-sourced default for port/candidates/hash-tuning "for convenience" during an unrelated change, recreating the original problem. Mitigation: .kiro/steering/config-design.md now documents the general rule; this spec's removal is the concrete enforcement.
  • Risk: The checked-in ha/data/cluster.bin might carry non-default values for the removed fields, silently masking a real backward-compat issue if the live-soak test (Requirement 5.3) doesn't actually inspect them first. Mitigation: Requirement 5.3 (and Testing Strategy below) mandates inspecting or synthesizing non-default legacy field values before relying on that test as proof.
  • Risk: test_commit_barrier_rollout.c:1359 / test_config_repl.c:983 are the only known struct-literal hits, but a broader grep pattern might surface more during implementation. Mitigation: Requirement 5.1's catch-all clause; the build itself will fail loudly on any missed site (C struct field removal is a compile error, not a silent runtime gap).

References

  • src/docs/cluster-config-split-analysis.md — prior team analysis (2026-06-08), primary design input for the dead-field classification.
  • .kiro/steering/config-design.md — general shared-vs-local config classification rule this spec enforces.
  • .kiro/specs/admin-config-tool/requirements.md — downstream consumer whose "per-instance field preservation" risk this spec closes structurally.

Design Review (/kiro-validate-design, 2026-07-20)

Initial GO/NO-GO: NO-GO, 3 issues found on a fresh critical pass of the first design draft. All fixed in design.md directly:

  1. Flow diagram dropped the zero-value fallback trigger. Original diagram branched on "name found" (boolean); actual pre-spec code branches on my_port == 0, which also covers "found but that candidate's port field is malformed/zero" (main.c:289-291 already WARNs on this input). As drafted, a matched-but-zero-port entry would have bound to literal port 0. Fixed: diagram and Service Interface contract now check the port value, not just match presence.
  2. Removing the -EINVAL path conflated two different scenarios. Original design treated "--peers never passed" (true single-node) and "--peers passed but local name absent" (likely operator typo) identically — both silently falling to --port/hardcoded-default. User decision (interactive, during review): keep today's hard error for the second case; only the first gets the new fallback. Rationale: the project's fail-loud convention (src/controller/CLAUDE.md process-lifecycle invariant) — a silent wrong-default here would surface later as a confusing "peer unreachable" symptom instead of a clear startup error now. Fixed: System Flows, Service Interface, and Error Handling sections all updated to reflect the split.
  3. Requirement 6 missing from Boundary Commitments. Present in File Structure Plan/Components/Traceability but not in "This Spec Owns" — mechanical inconsistency. Fixed: one bullet added.

Re-affirmed GO after fixes — no further review pass required (fixes were direct, not requiring a requirements-phase return).

Design Revision (/kiro-impl kickoff, 2026-07-20)

Reversed the Architecture Pattern Evaluation decision (Option A → Option B) before implementation started, per direct user instruction at the start of /kiro-impl.

  • Original choice: Option A, a new --port CLI flag + myconf_t.port field, mirroring --vcpus.
  • Revised choice: Option B (previously rejected) — no new CLI flag. cluster_open_listener's fallback becomes two-tier: --peers candidate match (unchanged) → hardcoded XCE_CONTROLLER_DEFAULT_PORT (9990) when --peers was never passed at all. Operators who want a non-default single-node port pass a single self-referencing --peers <name>=<host>:<port> entry (matching -n/--myname) — an already-existing, already-supported invocation mode (confirmed working: single-node primary via --peers omission OR a 1-peer --peers self-quorum entry are both live paths today, verified by grepping cluster_open_listener's existing candidate-match loop against c->myconf->name).
  • Why the reversal holds up: the original rejection of Option B was "removes a documented, intentionally-supported invocation mode" — but Option B as now scoped does NOT remove the zero---peers mode; it only asks operators who need a non-default port in that mode to use the already-supported 1-peer --peers form instead of a brand-new flag. Zero new surface area, zero new plumbing (main.c argp wiring, myconf_t.port field, myconf.vcpus-style wiring all become unnecessary), and it reuses code that already exists and is already exercised.
  • Requirements impact: none — Requirement 1.7 already listed "requiring single-node mode to pass a self-referencing --peers entry" as an explicit example alternative and left mechanism selection to the design phase.
  • Design impact: design.md's Overview, Goals, Boundary Commitments, Architecture diagram, File Structure Plan, Requirements Traceability, Components and Interfaces, Service Interface contract, and System Flows are all updated in place to reflect the two-tier fallback with no CLI Component for Requirement 1.7 (the CLI Component now exists only for the optional Requirement 6 tunables, reusing the pre-existing --vcpus pattern directly rather than a --port precedent).
  • Tasks impact: tasks.md's former Task 2 (--port CLI flag) is removed; all subsequent major tasks renumbered down by one.
  • Note: xce_parse_peers also accepts a bare host:port candidate (no name= prefix), matched via hostname when no name is given — but design.md/tasks.md document the explicit name=host:port form as the canonical example for this replacement mechanism (clearer about intent than relying on hostname matching implicitly).

Design Revision 2: Ordinal-Gap Discovery (/kiro-impl task 1.1, 2026-07-20)

The task 1.1 implementer, before touching the schema, found and empirically proved a contradiction between Requirement 3.1 (retained fields keep their literal original @N field number) and Requirement 4.2 (direct removal, no field-number reservation): Cap'n Proto requires struct ordinals to be a gapless 0..N-1 sequence — verified independently (capnp compile on a schema with a gap fails: error: Skipped ordinal @1. Ordinals must be sequential with no holes.). Deleting 8 fields from the middle of ClusterConfig's 21 while freezing the 13 survivors' literal ordinals is not something any compiling schema can satisfy — you either renumber the survivors (breaks their wire byte-offsets for anything reading an old blob) or leave inert renamed placeholders at the old ordinals (which is field-number reservation, exactly what 4.2 forbids).

Neither requirements.md nor design.md had anticipated this; both were written assuming Cap'n Proto allows field deletion independent of ordinal freezing, which is not the case.

  • Decision (user, interactive): renumber the 13 survivors to a contiguous 0..12 range — literal direct removal, matching Requirement 4.2's exact text and the project's "still pre-release, no wire-compat obligation" posture. Requirement 3.1 amended to drop "field number" from its invariance clause (type/semantics only); Requirement 3.2 and 4.1 amended to state plainly that a cluster.bin built before this spec is not expected to decode correctly (not just the removed fields — every retained field after the first removed one shifts byte-offset).
  • Consequence discovered next: the checked-in ha/data/cluster.bin (deploy-ha.sh:33-36 copies it verbatim as every cluster's seed config) is itself a pre-spec artifact. Post-renumbering, its retained fields (resources, queues, hostConfigs, hproviders, limits, etc.) would silently decode to wrong bytes — breaking /xce-deploy-ha and /xce-test-ha for every future spec that depends on that fixture, not just this one's verification task. No existing tool rebuilds this blob (xceadmin config build isn't implemented yet — separate, unstarted spec).
  • Decision (user, interactive): add a task to regenerate ha/data/cluster.bin — decode its current retained-field values under the pre-spec schema, re-encode under the new schema with a small throwaway tool (written and discarded, not shipped), overwrite the fixture in place. New Requirement 5.3; old 5.3 (3-node soak) → 5.4, old 5.4 (single-node) → 5.5. tasks.md gained a new task 5.1 (regenerate fixture) ahead of the renumbered 3-node-soak task.
  • Rationale: given the renumbering choice, the fixture WILL be silently wrong if left untouched — this is not optional cleanup, it's a repo-wide landmine for every HA spec's live verification, self-inflicted by this spec's own schema edit. Regenerating it once, in-scope, is far cheaper than every future spec independently rediscovering "why is deploy-ha producing garbage config."
  • Scope boundary held: the throwaway encoding tool is explicitly NOT a permanent addition — building a real cluster.bin authoring tool is admin-config-tool's job (xceadmin config build), not this spec's. This task only needs to reproduce ONE known blob's values under the new layout, not build general tooling.

Design Revision 3: Orphaned HashZArrayConfig/ResmgrConfig Structs (/kiro-impl task 2.1, 2026-07-20)

The task 1.1 implementer deliberately left HashZArrayConfig and ResmgrConfig (the capnp struct types used by the now-removed jobmgr/workermgr/qmgr/xstrings/resmgr fields) in controller.capnp, correctly noting no requirement or task text asked for their removal — they compile fine as unreferenced-but-valid struct definitions on their own. Task 1.2 then removed their corresponding hand-written C typedefs (hash_zarray_config_t, resmgr_config_t) from clusterconfig.h, since nothing in cluster_config_t referenced them anymore. The task 2.1 implementer's partial syntax check surfaced the resulting break: capnp's C codegen still emits HashZArrayConfig/ResmgrConfig encode/decode prototypes referencing hash_zarray_config_t/resmgr_config_t via their $C.mapname(...) bindings — types that no longer exist anywhere in the tree.

  • Root cause: this is the same class of gap Requirement 1.6 already closed for MasterCandidate (used only by the removed candidates field) — just missed for the tunables side during the original requirements pass, since MasterCandidate was called out explicitly by name while the tunables' supporting struct types were not.
  • Decision: extend the same treatment — remove HashZArrayConfig/ResmgrConfig from controller.capnp. Verified via grep (same method as the original MasterCandidate verification) that neither struct is referenced anywhere else in the schema. New Requirement 2.5 added (mirrors 1.6's phrasing); design.md's File Structure Plan and Requirements Traceability updated; tasks.md gained task 1.3 (Schema Component, same boundary as 1.1) to close this before task 4's full build.
  • Why this wasn't caught in the requirements-phase discovery pass: the original cluster-config-split-analysis.md and this spec's requirements-phase grep swept for the FIELDS being removed, not for supporting/nested struct TYPES those fields' capnp types depended on. A useful pattern for future field-removal specs: after identifying fields to remove, also check whether any of their types are struct types used nowhere else in the schema.